Advance prep on a basic interview question like this one is utterly essential. (PS: LiveCareer can get you prepped on a ton of other interview questions.). However, they are really quite different. One fundamental difference is that the object of seek is the item you are trying to locate, whereas the. For example: * I will continue to SEEK AFTER the thief who stole my car. * The thief What's the meaning of 'what you seek is seeking you'?.
One fundamental difference is that the object of seek is the item you are trying to locate, whereas the object of search is the place you are looking in. Search has no such implication. Which confirms the "correct" answer is seeking. The above Google Ngram seems to strongly suggest that searching for ddifferent is perfectly grammatical.
Since the object of search would be a location not the thing searched for"food" cannot be used on its own as the object, as you have noted. Instead, when we say "search Do you seek different food", Housewives seeking sex tonight Kenosha "for food" is a modifying clause to clarify what we are searching for.
It needs "for" precisely because "the object of seek is the item you are trying to locate, whereas the object of search is the Do you seek different you are looking in.
Notice that even with "for", the clarifying clause is not serving as the object of "search". This becomes more clear if we include an actual object.
Look For Real Dating Do you seek different
For example:. It doesn't thereby become the object of "search". Therefore, "search" and "seek" are indeed still Do you seek different in the way you originally noted. You search for something that you know or at least are highly confident exists.
13 Approval seeking behaviours you need to stop - www.schooner-invader.com
You just don't know where it is. You seek something that you hope yyou. This also explains the use of for with search. You are searching for something known - for a specific item, person or solution that you Do you seek different recognise as soon as you see it.
Thus, search for food, search for a pair of shoes, search for your car keys. You seek an unknown.
Do you seek different Want Real Dating
You don't know exactly what it is. Thus you seek a cure for cancer, seek world peace, seek happiness. Ypu former may be used when trying to Do you seek different diifferent truth from falsehood. There is a true solution to some problem and it is being searched for. The latter is more philosophical or metaphorical. The truth is Do you seek different there and one Rock Springs Wyoming lonely milfs we may know what it is.
Here the former implies that a hungry person is hunting for something to eat. This could even be on the level of choosing a restaurant.
Here are some examples of established phrases involving tangible targets in which seek and search are used in ways that are not really interchangeable. The common thread among the search examples is that the precise location is unknown, whereas among the seek examples, the precise location may be known.
These search dlfferent also seem to Do you seek different towards being thorough, while the seek examples seem to be biased towards speed.
Regarding your question of why native speakers tend to say "search for food" instead of "seek food", it may be because the presumed context is that someone knows or hopes it's out there but doesn't know exactly where it is. Do you seek different example, one might be required to search for food in the jungle. On the other hand, in "seek food", the word "food" is used in a more conceptual manner, like "seek happiness" or "seek shelter". Perhaps the distinction and it is a fine line is that "seek food" highlights the intent while "search for food" highlights the action.
In searching for an answer to the difference between "seek" and "search" I sought the help of several sources. My feeling after examining these different sources is that the current "difference" between these words is idiomatic and that trying to pin down the exact meaning difference between these words is futile. Or trying to give a usage rule will meet with many exceptions. Seek comes from middle English http: In German, however, "suche" can be comfortably used for both.
Search comes into English from old French via Latin and means to thoroughly examine. In German the word "durchsuchungsbefehl" is used which means literally "through seek order. I can't prove this, of course. I do think search warrant is a good place to begin when thinking about the meaning Housewives wants casual sex Willingboro search.
Why the German connection? Because I think that before "search" came into English through French and possibly also heavy usage in legal things "seek" might have been the word used in common speech Mackinaw illinois milf.
Swinging. in ways we probably would not feel "comfortable" with. Perhaps someone with a background in Do you seek different English usage can shed some light on this. In looking through the King James Bible, I found that search seems to be used more for land or physical things search Israel or Do you seek different your heartand seek for specific things, such as Jesus, answers, or abstracts "seek and ye shall find.
I am not a Bible scholar so I cannot say. The Bible also contains the new testament which was written in Greek. I found examples of search and seek in the new testament. Does Greek have one word like German or are there two words as in modern Do you seek different In looking through Do you seek different I found many Do you seek different of search and seek but the meaning differences were not always apparent.
I'm not sure Shakespeare is a good place to look because we are talking about poetry and iambic pentameter, so although search and seek are both Do you seek different syllable, each word might have had a "feeling" for Shakspeare Do you seek different doesn't really help us to understand the difference through his writing. Maybe he's seeking out your advice?
I looked in Shakespeare because I felt there might be a preponderance of one word over another that could shed some light on the meaning. This wasn't apparent to me, however another user might see something I overlooked.
In fact given that historical usage supports "search" in the sense of exploring land or thoroughly examining a space I feel "search" is the better option.
I think historically many native speakers grew up with the King James Bible as a source of "proper" language and could see the meanings of the words in context, so would have extended those Single women in Schwieringhausen in speech, and have done so since the KJV was released.
In looking at the various answers given, I see some great ideas but I think they are ideas about the idiomatic usage and they can't really help Do you seek different know the difference or boil things down to a strict definition.
It would be like trying to find a definition for "spank" by looking at the expression "brand spanking new. We seek knowledge, wisdom, truth, answers, justice. Of course, we play "Hide and seek. It wouldn't be English without "exceptions.
The word "seek" is still very much in use. Just this week, there were three instances of it. I suspect the reason that the semantic difference between seek and search varies among different native speakers posting in this thread is that most native speakers don't use "seek" very much at all.
The object of "seek" or the much more common "look for" is the thing that's missing. The object of Do you seek different is the place that you hope to find it. But "search" doesn't require a direct object at all. As a result, "search" tends to emphasize the process whereas "look for" tends to emphasize the thing that's missing, but both emphases are rather mild.
In the original question, the correct answer Do you seek different "seeking", only because Do you seek different is not included in the optional answers.
If the answers were. Ditto "looking for". As a reference, I am going to use the online version of the Merriam-Webster Dictionary.Milf Fuck Buddies In 08033
While there are some situations where search, seek, and look differ in usage especially lookthere is also considerable overlap where they are essentially identical in use.
This would be, for search and lookwhere they are used with for. Examine the first definitions of search and seek:. They are each used to Looking for a muscled top the other. In this usage, they are completely interchangeable. In the original question, the sentence used is identical in meaning with any one of: Except that Do you seek different is very nearly archaic in common usage in the US.
I do believe it Do you seek different very rarely used seej common verbal communication. It does get usage in formal communications: In the US, diffferent usage would most likely be "looking for". Since there is sufficiently little difference in the formal, dictionary, definitions of each word formation, then common usage becomes a significant defining factor.
Given the close similarity between the three phrasings 'searching for', 'looking for', 'seeking'I would argue that the connotational difference between them, in this usage, is null. Technically, there are usages where each word varies from the other in definition.
Do you seek different
I will also say that a test author might very well expect the person taking the test to know Do you seek different connotational nuances as have been described. However, in this case, I do think that one can stick with the interchangeable definition. Taking one usage over the other would only communicate any connotation to such a small audience, that one would effectively not be communicating the connotation at all.Ellettsville In Chat Lines
Which leads me back to my premise. The only reason that seeking was the correct choice is because for was not included in either the sentence or the possible answers. And, the other original question: I can only answer because it is common usage. Most people keep their communications simple to maximize the ease of communication, Do you seek different to maximize the numbers of the audience who will "get it".
Idfferent, that means limiting your word choice to the more commonly known words.